Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fangzhou Liu vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Liu vs Kuramochi analysis and find out who is favored!
Fangzhou Liu vs Miho Kuramochi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Liu 0 - 0 Kuramochi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Liu has won 49.81% of points on their second serve, while Kuramochi has won 41.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Liu, in recent form, has won 51.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kuramochi has won 58.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.87% and 44.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Liu has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kuramochi has saved 54.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Liu has won 54.72% of matches played (W/L 29/ 24), with Kuramochi winning 61.02% (W/L 36/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Liu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 317/ 185), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10). Kuramochi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 18/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Liu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22), where as Kuramochi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 28/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Liu has played against opponents with an average rank of 284.74 while Kuramochi has played against players with an average rank of 305.54.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Liu has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kuramochi has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Liu has converted 52.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kuramochi has converted 46.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
398
Rank
127
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
378
Rank
378
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
61% (331-208)
Career Total W/L
62% (104-63)
50% (11-11)
YTD W/L
61% (20-13)
$169,346
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fangzhou Liu | Miho Kuramochi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 61% (20/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (25/22) | 61% (48/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (223/209) | 55% (389/323) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (11/11) | 58% (15/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 77 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 131 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:38 | 1:57:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 323.68 | 297 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (818/1336) | 73% (1735/2384) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (533/818) | 59% (1023/1735) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (258/518) | 42% (271/649) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (75/144) | 46% (168/364) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (591/1377) | 49% (1218/2474) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (11/11) | 61% (20/13) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (11/22) | 61% (20/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 75% (6/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 38% (5/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 88% (17/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 12% (17/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 31% (16/5) |
Fangzhou Liu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Petra Hule
Player
Fangzhou Liu
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hina Inoue
Player
Fangzhou Liu
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xinxin Yao
Player
Fangzhou Liu
47%
(
35 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fangzhou Liu
Player
I-Hsuan Cho
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Fangzhou Liu
46%
(
48 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
7
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
39%
(
22 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fangzhou Liu
Player
Jing-Jing Lu
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
78%
(
28 of
36)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yufei Ren
Player
Fangzhou Liu
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fangzhou Liu
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fangzhou Liu
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sijia Wei
Player
Fangzhou Liu
53%
(
59 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
111)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
116
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Miho Kuramochi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Miho Kuramochi
47%
(
55 of
116)
1st Serve %
67%
(
79 of
118)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
13
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
38%
(
23 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
64 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
63 of
118)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Eri Shimizu
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
0%
(
0 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
26 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Miho Kuramochi
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
75%
(
77 of
103)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Miho Kuramochi
58%
(
68 of
117)
1st Serve %
75%
(
94 of
125)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
54 of
94)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
55 of
125)
125
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Maddison Inglis
75%
(
79 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Ayano Shimizu
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Miho Kuramochi
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Saki Imamura
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Liu Vs Kuramochi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
